Paging MAST CELL experts - I think this is my smoking gun!!

Feel free to discuss any topic of general interest, so long as nothing you post here is likely to be interpreted as insulting, and/or inflammatory, nor clearly designed to provoke any individual or group. Please be considerate of others feelings, and they will be considerate of yours.

Moderators: Rosie, Stanz, Jean, CAMary, moremuscle, JFR, Dee, xet, Peggy, Matthew, Gabes-Apg, grannyh, Gloria, Mars, starfire, Polly, Joefnh

Post Reply
User avatar
Zizzle
King Penguin
King Penguin
Posts: 3492
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:47 am

Paging MAST CELL experts - I think this is my smoking gun!!

Post by Zizzle »

So I googled "Dermatomyositis and Mast Cells" and came across some interesting recent research. It seems the skin rash of Dermatomyositis is initially caused by excess mast cells in the skin, and the rash is a sign they have degranulated. This is hopeful news for me, because it suggests I might be able to avoid Prednisone, Plaquenil, Methotrexate and CellCept, the standard therapies for DM. I've been avoiding my doctors during this flare, because I think they will want me on meds ASAP. Thankfully, daily Claritin and steroid creams make the rash calmer and more bearable.

This short research article is a worthwhile read because it implicates mast cells in nearly all autoimmune diseases of the skin and mucosa. I believe my MC is the same disease as my skin rash, just in a different location. Of course now I know I need to protect my lungs from being the next target of the attack. I understand there is great risk of interstitial lung disease if I don't get treatment.

That said, can anyone glean anything from this article that might suggest next steps for me? Remind me, where can I find a mast-cell expert doctor in the DC area? Are they usually immonologists, rhuematologists, or something else? I'll check the Mastocytosis organization website.

Would mast-cell stabilizing creams and antihistamines be enough to slow or stop this process or do I need more heavy-duty systemic treatments aimed at the mast cells? What would those be?

Here is an excerpt from the article. Seems Tex was right all along...

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2946445/

New Roles for Mast Cells in Autoimmunity

Mast cells, which do not usually circulate in the blood but acquire their phenotype in the tissues where they reside, are central mediators of a wide variety of stimuli. Shrestha and colleagues (10) are the first to directly implicatemast cells in the pathogenesis of human DM skin disease, although mast cells have been reported as a prominent infiltrating cell of the skin lesions of dogs with DM (19). Increased numbers of mast cells have been reported in polymyositis patients in the muscle tissue, particularlyin areas of necrosis and regeneration (20)and as part of the interstitial inflammatory infiltrate (21), although an increased number of mast cells was not found to be present in juvenile DM muscle biopsies (10).

Over the past decade an expanded role for mast cells has emerged, not only as the cell critical in the response to allergens, but as a primary cell for host defense and initiation of innate immune responses in tissues located at the interface between the host and the environment, especially the skin, mucosa, gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts. Mast cells are not only activated by the high affinity IgE receptor, but also by Fc gamma receptors, complement receptors and toll-like receptors after interaction with bacterial products and viral RNA, and even by physical stimuli including ultraviolet B irradiation (22;23). Notably, ultraviolet B irradiation and viruses have been implicated as some of the possible environmental risk factors for DM (6;24). Activated mast cells secrete a number of pro-inflammatory mediators including type I interferons, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β and result in the influx of TH2 T lymphocytes and dendritic cells, all of which are thought to be critical factors in the pathogenesis of DM (22;23;25). Mast cells then may be an early key initiator of the pathogenic sequence of events in DM, at least in the skin tissue.

Mast cells are emerging as a critical player inmediating a number of systemic and organ-specific autoimmune diseases. In a K/BxN mouse model of rheumatoid arthritis, knock out of mast cells by two different pathways (deficiency of stem cell factor and of c-kit, a mast cell differentiation factor) leads to abrogation of disease, whereas engraftment of mast cells restores joint inflammation (26). Agents that inhibit mast cell degranulation, such as salbutamol, slow the progression of collagen-induced arthritis (27). In the MRL/lpr mouse model of lupus, a dense mast cell infiltrate is present in the dermis of the affected skin lesions in animals older than 4 months of age; and, this correlates with decreased histamine methyltransferase activity and prolonged activation of histamine in the affected skin tissue (28). Mast cells are also increased in the affected skin of patients with chronic cutaneous lupus (28). Activated mast cells have also been reported in the skin of patients with systemic sclerosis, and mast-cell targeted therapies improve the skin disease of the tight-skin mouse model of scleroderma (22). Mast cell deficient mice either do not develop disease, as in bullous pemphigoid, or have less severe and delayed disease, as in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model of multiple sclerosis (22;27). Mast cells likely play a role in the pathogenesis of a number of other autoimmune disorders, including Graves’ disease, systemic vasculitis, insulin-dependent diabetes, Sjogren’s syndrome, Guillain-Barre syndrome and pemphigus vulgaris, based on the findings of increased mast cell numbers in the affected tissues and/or an improvement in disease with mast cell-targeted therapies (22).
Now I'm wondering whether the rash of DM is/should be considered a form of Cuteneous Mastocytosis?
Cutaneous mastocytosis is the proliferation of mast cells in the skin without any evidence of involvement of other organs. Symptoms can be only cutaneous or only systemic, depending if there is local or generalized release of mediators from mast cells. Mast cells can infiltrate multiple organs, including skin, spleen, bone marrow, liver, and lymph nodes, with the skin being the most frequent target.

Cutaneous mastocytosis is associated with local and systemic symptoms, including cutaneous flushing; blisters; dyspnea; rash; exacerbation of asthma; hypotension; gastrointestinal disorders, such as gastroesophageal reflux; ulcers; and diarrhea. These symptoms result from mast cell degranulation with the release of several mediators, histamine being the most significant of all mediators, which can cause both local and systemic reactions.

Most cases of cutaneous mastocytosis start in childhood. TMEP is a rare form, occurring more often in adults than children. The age of manifestation has an important value for prognosis. Most pediatric patients with cutaneous mastocytosis show improvement in symptoms over time, with 50 percent showing resolution of symptoms in adolescence and only 10 to 15 percent persisting in adulthood.

In pediatric patients, unlike in adults, it is believed that a transitory deregulation of growth factors occurs. In adults, a c-kit proto-oncogene mutation is observed, which entails a mast cell hyperplasia. The c-kit encodes the KIT proto-oncogene, a tyrosine kinase, which is the mast cell's growth factor receptor. This particular mutation, however, was not found in pediatric patients or familial mastocytosis. Although the c-kit mutations are not found in all patients with cutaneous mastocytosis, proto-oncogene alterations may indicate a more aggressive behavior of the mastocytosis.

Cutaneous mastocytosis may appear in four clinical variants: urticaria pigmentosa, isolated mastocytoma, cutaneous diffuse or erythrodermic mastocytosis, and telangiectasia macularis eruptiva perstans. The occurrence of systemic symptoms may indicate the presence of associated hematological diseases or even a systemic mastocytosis condition. Signs of systemic involvement include hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, and bone alterations.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3196299/

I'm going to see if my dermatologist can still ask for staining and a mast cell count on my skin biopsy. I doubt he'll agree, but I'll try.
User avatar
Zizzle
King Penguin
King Penguin
Posts: 3492
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:47 am

Post by Zizzle »

Here's what they say about treatments for Cutaneous Mastocytosis. Anyone have any experience with them? I'm happy to try PUVA, other antihistamines, etc.
There is no gold standard medication for the treatment of TMEP and it is essential to identify and avoid factors that stimulate the mast cell's degradation, such as exposure to sunlight, extreme temperatures, alcohol, and drugs. H1 antagonists are used to control pruritus and urticaria. Psoralen plus ultraviolet light A treatment results in improvement of symptoms and regression of skin lesions by inhibiting histamine release by mast cells. However, recurrence can occur after a variable interval from the end of treatment. The intense light pulsed with a 585nm wavelength has shown efficiency in two cases reported in the literature, but with recurrence after 14 months of treatment. Ketotifen, doxepin, cromolyn sodium, topical and systemic corticosteroids, leukotriene antagonists, alpha interferon, and use of “electron beam” radiation were also reported
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35072
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

Hi Zizzle,

I apologize, because I thought that you already knew that all autoimmune issues were associated with mast cell problems. That was one of the primary points of chapter 16 in my book.

I don't consider myself to be an expert on mast cell issues, but it appears to me that most of the treatments that were listed in the quote that you included in your last post will have at least some systemic effects, so whether you're dealing with cutaneous mastocytosis or a systemic form, may be sort of a moot point, as far as treatment is concerned, (especially since you and your doctors may not be able to definitively distinguish between those forms anyway).

Here is the list of mast cell specialists found by members to be helpful. Note the different categories of specialization.

http://www.perskyfarms.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=14421

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
User avatar
mbeezie
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 3:14 am
Location: Texas

Post by mbeezie »

Zizzle,

Is the DM a definitive diagnosis? I would push for the biopsy and some preliminary labwork (serum tryptase, urine n-methylhistamine etc. You need to make sure it is DM and not TMEP. I don'tknow much about the cutaneous forms of masto but I am guessing you would need some form of a mast cell stabilizer. I think Julie was from your area and she ended up driving to see Dr. Afrin.

Mary Beth
"If you believe it will work out, you'll see opportunities. If you believe it won't you will see obstacles." - Dr. Wayne Dyer
User avatar
Zizzle
King Penguin
King Penguin
Posts: 3492
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:47 am

Post by Zizzle »

Mary Beth,
I emailed the Mastocytosis organization and one of their Board members wrote back. She lives a couple of miles from me in MD. She said it's slim pickins in this area, but I'm expecting a response from her soon with some options. Regarding the diagnosis, both my docs agree it could be Amyopathic DM, and can't think of any alternative. The skin biopsy was consistent with DM ("interface vacuolar dermatitis") but not fully diagnostic of DM. The locations of the rashes are the dead giveaway (scalp, upper back, chest, hips, Gottron's papules on the knuckles, and the tell-tale cuticle changes). I am missing the #1 pathognomonic feature, the heliope rash on the eyelids (although I do have transient red dots and spider veins on the eyelids). Nevertheless, very little is known about DM without muscle involvement, and the treatments haven't advanced in decades (with the exception of offering CellCept now :roll:). I am trying to propose that ADM is in fact a novel form of cutaneous mastocytosis, and I believe I can achieve remission by stabilizing the mast cells involved.

The gradual worsening of my reactions to high-histamine foods as the rash worsens, I beleive, is a sign that my mast cells are getting further out of control. My dramatic response to Claritin (MC-wise), is more evidence.

The other reason why I'm pursuing this is because I desperately want to avoid immunosuppresants. With my history of EBV, I'll be welcoming lymphoma or some other worse outcome. The truth is, I feel fine overall. Why take meds that will make me feel sicker??
Leah
King Penguin
King Penguin
Posts: 2533
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:16 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area

Post by Leah »

Have you tried to up your does of antihistamines? I read recently here that someone was taking tons of antihistamines for something else and her MC symptoms went away. Just curious if you would get relief from the rash.

Leah
User avatar
Zizzle
King Penguin
King Penguin
Posts: 3492
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:47 am

Post by Zizzle »

Not yet. I suppose that's next, although I don't look forward to the extra dryness. Maybe I'll take Allegra at night, Claritin in the morning... Or start Zantac instead of Allegra? Of course I know this rash could take weeks to start going away. I won't expect overnight results. But I'd like to get the mast cell testing done before I get hooked on mega-doses of antihistamines. I see my dermatologist in 2 weeks. Maybe if I come armed with a list of specific tests, he'll send me to get them? Does anyone know...do I need to be off antihistamines for these tests to be accurate?
User avatar
Zizzle
King Penguin
King Penguin
Posts: 3492
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:47 am

Post by Zizzle »

Just to give a sense of the odds I'm up against if this is Amyopathic Dermatomyositis (ADM): :sad:
Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Aug;28(8):979-84. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
Amyopathic dermatomyositis or dermatomyositis-like skin disease: retrospective review of 16 cases with amyopathic dermatomyositis.

Abstract
Amyopathic dermatomyositis (ADM) is characterized by the presence of dermatomyositis (DM) for 6 months or more in individuals who have normal muscle enzymes and no clinically significant muscle weakness. The aim of the study was to investigate the initial laboratory data, clinical manifestations, complications, and clinical outcomes of patients with the diagnosis of ADM. We reported 16 cases with the cutaneous findings of dermatomyositis without clinical or laboratory evidence of muscle disease for at least 2 years after onset of the skin manifestations in the Department of Dermatology and Rheumatology at Shanghai Ruijin Hospital between 1998 and 2004. All patients had Gottron's papules, periungual erythema/telangiectasia, and violaceous discoloration of the face, neck, upper chest, and back at some time during the course of their disease. Follow-up of 1 to 10 years after diagnosis found muscle weakness in three patients (18.75%) within 5 years of diagnosis. One patient (6.15%) was rediagnosed as chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE). Four patients (25%) had associated malignancies. Twelve patients (75%) had radiographic evidence indicative of interstitial fibrosis irrespective of respiratory symptoms. Patients with ADM appear to be at risk for developing the same potentially fatal disease complications as those patients with DM (e.g., interstitial lung disease and internal malignancy). These cases further emphasize that the cutaneous manifestations of dermatomyositis are pathognomonic for DM and we propose the term dermatomyositis-like skin disease as a better designation than amyopathic dermatomyositis to describe this distinctive subset of cutaneous symptoms. Dermatomyositis-like skin disease is a complex syndrome, which includes the characteristic cutaneous eruption of dermatomyositis without clinical evidence of muscle disease. Our findings suggest that patients diagnosed with this syndrome are at risk for fatal interstitial lung disease, malignancy, and/or delayed onset of DM or CCLE. Cautious systematic clinical trials should be considered for this group of patients.
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35072
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

Zizzle,

Concerning the prognosis, remember that it is almost certain that none of those patients removed all (or even any) of their food sensitivities from their diet. Proper diet intervention has a very powerful ability to suppress the development of autoimmune disease, and that has to make a significant difference in the long-term prognosis.

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
User avatar
Zizzle
King Penguin
King Penguin
Posts: 3492
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:47 am

Post by Zizzle »

Thanks Tex,
I know you are right. I'll take hope in any form! I did read a study that 85% of DM patients have the HLADQA1*0501 allele, which I most surely have along with my DQB1*0201 celiac gene. That must mean gluten is somehow involved in the pathogenesis...and prognosis. It's a shame the average DM patient is totally in the dark about this connection, just blindly accepting a life of prednisone and methotrexate with no hope for alternatives. It'a a crime.

The DQB1*0201 allele is genetically linked to DQA1*0501 and DRB1*03. With DQA1*0501 it forms the DQ2.5cis encoding haplotype, with DRB1*03 it becomes part of the DR3-DQ2 (DR-DQ) serologically defined haplotype. With DQA1*0501 the allele is most frequently found in coeliac disease. With DR3 this DQ2 has the second strongest linkage to Type 1 diabetes, and when paired with HLA-DQ8 is the most abundant phenotype found in late onset, "Type1-Type2" diabetes mellitus type 1. As the incidence of coeliac disease is about 1% this allele is associated with more autoimmune disease relative to any other DQ haplotype
User avatar
Zizzle
King Penguin
King Penguin
Posts: 3492
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:47 am

Post by Zizzle »

This article gave me hope, of course, except the patient's DM completely resolved on the GF diet. Mine came back despite the diet! And I am rediculously GF right now! Only one restaurant meal in months and a GF household!

Dermatomyositis associated with celiac disease: Response to a gluten-free diet

In the case presented, it is unique that the patient did not have overt gastrointestinal symptoms and that both the dermatomyositis and celiac disease remitted in response to gluten withdrawal. Although our patient did receive two doses of pulse methylprednisolone when the diagnosis of dermatomyositis was first established, she was never placed on continuous steroid treatment. Furthermore, the gradual improvement in her symptoms occurred only after gluten restriction was initiated, and dermatomyositis remained in remission with a gluten-free diet.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2659927/
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35072
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

That's a pretty impressive find (and a very profound article). It may be that MC is somehow complicating your situation in ways that you haven't discovered, yet. I have no doubt that you will discover those ways though (if they exist), sooner or later, through research. Like MC, most cases are probably different, and follow somewhat different patterns. Or perhaps additional genes (or epigenes), and/or their triggers, might also be involved.

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
User avatar
Zizzle
King Penguin
King Penguin
Posts: 3492
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:47 am

Post by Zizzle »

My husband has been asking me why I don't at least try a course of steroids (like the "medrol pack"? he takes for poison ivy), just until the rash clears, then taper down. Would this be a mistake? Would I be inviting an even greater flare afterwards? Or is there a chance, as mentioned in the article, that remission could follow once the rash cycle is interrupted?

I'm doing much better now that I'm applying steroid cream at least once a day and moisturing 2-3 times a day. I'm hooked on Claritin too...zero side effects. The red/violet patches remain, but the itch is manageable (no more scratching my butt in public). But once I accidentally start to scratch, more itching ensues and bumps appear.

My biggest fear is my slowly dying cuticles, which supposedly is a sign of disease progression. But maybe it's just cold weather dryness? The Gottrons papules on my fingers are worse too. Then again, they are the only part of my body that still get sun. Time to wear gloves everywhere...

My challenge now is to look semi-healthy for my 20th high school reunion next Friday!! Thank goodness for my Laura Mercier mineral foundation. It covers the unsightly brown/purple patches on my forehead!
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35072
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

Zizzle wrote:Would this be a mistake? Would I be inviting an even greater flare afterwards? Or is there a chance, as mentioned in the article, that remission could follow once the rash cycle is interrupted?
:shrug: Of course, I believe that there is a rebound effect in mast cell numbers when a corticosteroid is discontinued (that's why I believe that a very long dosage tapering process of budesonide seems to work much better than the traditional faster taper), but that doesn't mean that the treatment can't work as claimed.

Have you tried treating your cuticles with good old-fashioned Bag Balm? It can often provide virtually miraculous healing for troubled hands.

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
Post Reply

Return to “Main Message Board”