Flying Solo Without a Parachute...

Feel free to discuss any topic of general interest, so long as nothing you post here is likely to be interpreted as insulting, and/or inflammatory, nor clearly designed to provoke any individual or group. Please be considerate of others feelings, and they will be considerate of yours.

Moderators: Rosie, Stanz, Jean, CAMary, moremuscle, JFR, Dee, xet, Peggy, Matthew, Gabes-Apg, grannyh, Gloria, Mars, starfire, Polly, Joefnh

User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35072
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

Monique wrote:Yet, those same foods are high in histamine...I am puzzled.
The classic antigen-antibody reaction is similar to a key (the antigen) fitting into a lock (the antibody), in order to trigger (unlock) subsequent immune system responses. Unlike that event, however, the mast cells that cause the problems with MC do not even require the presence of antibodies in order to trigger a degranulation event that dumps histamines and other inflammatory mediators. In fact, the problem in most cases of mast cell activation disorder (MCAD) is that the mast cells tend to degranulate for no good reason. Antibodies, and antibody-based bonding have nothing to do with the process.

IOW, inflammation due to MCAD is typically caused by the inappropriate release of histamines and other inflammatory mediators (in the absence of antibodies). That implies that since excess histamine is already a problem, foods that are high in histamines will contribute to the problem, and so will foods that tend to cause mast cell degranulation.

The net result is that MCAD is another (separate and distinct) mechanism by which certain foods can trigger a reaction — a reaction that would not happen to someone who does not have MCAD (unless they happen to produce antibodies to those particular foods). It's kind of confusing, but do you see what I'm saying, or am I doing a poor job of explaining it?

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
User avatar
wmonique2
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin
Posts: 1048
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2012 9:06 am
Location: Georgia, U.S
Contact:

flying Solo Without a Parachute...

Post by wmonique2 »

Tex,

Let me read it tomorrow morning and try to decipher what you mean :smile:

I need to sleep on this one...

Monique
Diagnosed 2011 with LC. Currently on Low Dose Naltrexone (LDN)
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35072
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

OK, I edited my post to add a few words (5, actually) to define a couple of the terms that I used.

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
User avatar
wmonique2
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin
Posts: 1048
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2012 9:06 am
Location: Georgia, U.S
Contact:

flying Solo Without a Parachute...

Post by wmonique2 »

Thanks Tex. I reread it now and it makes sense. IOW, one thing has nothing to do with the other...they are 2 separate actions/reactions.

Monique
Diagnosed 2011 with LC. Currently on Low Dose Naltrexone (LDN)
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35072
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

Right. To the best of my understanding that's the way they work.

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
Post Reply

Return to “Main Message Board”