Why your body may still think it's getting gluten

Feel free to discuss any topic of general interest, so long as nothing you post here is likely to be interpreted as insulting, and/or inflammatory, nor clearly designed to provoke any individual or group. Please be considerate of others feelings, and they will be considerate of yours.

Moderators: Rosie, Stanz, Jean, CAMary, moremuscle, JFR, Dee, xet, Peggy, Matthew, Gabes-Apg, grannyh, Gloria, Mars, starfire, Polly, Joefnh

Post Reply
Deb
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin
Posts: 1657
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 7:01 pm
Location: Previously MN now GA

Why your body may still think it's getting gluten

Post by Deb »

Tex, this seems to correlate with your conclusions. What is your opinion of this blood test?
http://www.thepaleomom.com/2013/03/glut ... it-up.html
So what happens in cross-reactivity? In this case the amino acid sequence that an antibody recognizes is also present in another protein from another food (in the case of molecular mimicry, that sequence is also present is a protein in the human body). There are only 20 different amino acids, so while there are millions of possible ways to link various amount of each amino acid together to form a protein, there are certain amino acid sequences that do tend to repeat in biology.

The take home message: depending on exactly what antibody or antibodies your body forms against gluten, it/they may or may not cross-react with other foods. So, not only are you sensitive to gluten, but your body now recognizes non-gluten containing foods as one and the same. Who needs to worry about this? Any of the estimated 20% of people who are gluten intolerant or have celiac disease, i.e., have formed antibodies against gluten.

A recent study evaluated the potential cross-reactivity of 24 food antigens. These included:
◦Rye
◦Barley
◦Spelt
◦Polish Wheat
◦Oats (2 different cultivars)
◦Buckwheat
◦Sorghum
◦Millet
◦Amaranth
◦Quinoa
◦Corn
◦Rice
◦Potato
◦Hemp
◦Teff
◦Soy
◦Milk (Alpha-Casein, Beta-Casein, Casomorphin, Butyrophilin, Whey Protein and whole milk)
◦Chocolate
◦Yeast
◦Coffee (instant, latte, espresso, imported)
◦Sesame
◦Tapioca (a.k.a. cassava or yucca)
◦Eggs

They did not find cross-reactivity with all of these foods (as is implied by the Cyrex Labs gluten cross-reactivity blood test, a.k.a. Array 4). But, they did find that their anti-gliadin antibodies (antibodies that recognize the protein fraction of gluten) did cross-react with all dairy including whole milk and isolated dairy proteins (casein, casomorphin, butyrophilin, and whey)—this may explain the high frequency of dairy sensitivities in celiac patients—oats, brewer/baker’s yeast, instant coffee (but not fresh coffee), milk chocolate (attributable to the dairy proteins in chocolate), sorghum, millet, corn, rice and potato.
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35072
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

Hi Deb,

I'm not sure how to view those tests. The subject matter of the article that you cited does indeed correlate with my thoughts on this topic. I'm just not sure if Cyrex Labs has all their ducks in a row with those tests. They seem to offer a mind-boggling array of tests (at least they did the last time I visited their site), which suggests that they may be going overboard in trying to sell tests. Why so many tests? Why so many "bundles", or "panels"? It's hard to believe that so many options are all necessary.

Actually, I'm not sure that cross-reactivity tests are even necessary, because once we know that we are sensitive to gluten, that tells us right off the bat that we may also be sensitive to any protein with amino acid chains similar to the alpha gliadin peptide in wheat, (or any of the other several hundred reactive peptides, for that matter). So we are forewarned to watch out for such reactions, and we should be able to spot them, if/when they occur.

My take on this issue is that the longer and more severely we react, the more likely our immune system is to begin cross-reacting to similar amino acid sequences. While it may be necessary to avoid most of these additional foods while recovering, once the gut heals, cross-reactivity should no longer be a problem. I think that's the key here. And the point is that recovery can be accomplished without all those additional tests, because all that is required is to follow a bland diet that avoids all the known antigenic foods (which is basically the definition of the exclusion diet).

IOW, I think the concept does indeed have merit — I'm just not sure that all the additional testing is necessary or worth the money. :shrug: Zizzle had a bunch of those tests, if my memory is correct, but I'm not sure that she actually learned anything from them, that we didn't already know.

Of course, even EnteroLab is doing this, in a way, with their test for 11 additional antigenic foods (I say, "in a way", because their test is not a blood test). I'm not sure if they even realize that they are testing for cross-reactivity attributes, but I have a hunch that cross-reactivity is responsible for a positive result on that test. (That's just my opinion, of course).

Thanks for the link.

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
ladyathome
Adélie Penguin
Adélie Penguin
Posts: 101
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:08 am

Post by ladyathome »

tex

I would also like your opinion on how Enterolab test differ from Metametrix Gi Effects test?

http://www.metametrix.com/test-menu/pro ... gi-effects
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35072
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

Those two labs offer completely different types of tests. Metametrix offers tests for bacteria and parasites, whereas EnteroLab offers tests for food sensitivities and related issues such as fat malabsorption and markers of intestinal autoimmune reactions.

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
Post Reply

Return to “Main Message Board”