Modern Wheat Is The ‘Perfect Chronic Poison’ Says Expert

Feel free to discuss any topic of general interest, so long as nothing you post here is likely to be interpreted as insulting, and/or inflammatory, nor clearly designed to provoke any individual or group. Please be considerate of others feelings, and they will be considerate of yours.

Moderators: Rosie, Stanz, Jean, CAMary, moremuscle, JFR, Dee, xet, Peggy, Matthew, Gabes-Apg, grannyh, Gloria, Mars, starfire, Polly, Joefnh

Post Reply
User avatar
MBombardier
Rockhopper Penguin
Rockhopper Penguin
Posts: 1523
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:44 am
Location: Vancouver, WA

Modern Wheat Is The ‘Perfect Chronic Poison’ Says Expert

Post by MBombardier »

http://www.realfarmacy.com/modern-wheat ... ys-expert/
“This thing has many new features nobody told you about, such as there’s a new protein in this thing called gliadin. It’s not gluten. I’m not addressing people with gluten sensitivities and celiac disease. I’m talking about everybody else because everybody else is susceptible to the gliadin protein that is an opiate. This thing binds into the opiate receptors in your brain and in most people stimulates appetite, such that we consume 440 more calories per day, 365 days per year.”
Gee, makes me wonder why one of the tests for gluten sensitivity is anti-gliadin IgA antibody? I mean, since this guy is an expert and all... <sarc>
Marliss Bombardier

Dum spiro, spero -- While I breathe, I hope

Psoriasis - the dark ages
Hashimoto's Thyroiditis - Dec 2001
Collagenous Colitis - Sept 2010
Granuloma Annulare - June 2011
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35072
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

Wow! What an Idiot — a perfect example of a little education being a bad thing. :millianlaugh:

You know, one of the things that puzzle me about all of those guys who suddenly discover that wheat has changed drastically over the years (as if everything else hasn't changed at all), is the observation that if ancient wheat was so great, why don't they buy some land and start growing those ancient varieties again, and get rich while saving humanity? After all, seeds such as emmer wheat (which grew about 20,000 years ago), einkorn, (from about 10,000 years ago), hourani, (grown 2,000 years ago), all the way down to dozens of different varieties that were grown a century or 2 ago, are all available for planting.

Why don't they make use of their brilliant knowledge by putting their money where their mouth is, to revolutionize agriculture by showing us how easy it is to produce enough "safe", "healthy" wheat to feed the world? If they did that, the masses wouldn't have to continue eating all these corrupt modern crops that are destroying our health.

:rant:

Thanks for the link, and a good laugh.

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
User avatar
Zizzle
King Penguin
King Penguin
Posts: 3492
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:47 am

Post by Zizzle »

I actually think it's a decent article. He even mentions the problem of lectins.
Below the radar of conventional serological testing for antibodies against the various gluten proteins and genetic testing for disease susceptibility, the WGA “lectin problem” remains almost entirely obscured. Lectins, though found in all grains, seeds, legumes, dairy and our beloved nightshades: the tomato and potato, are rarely discussed in connection with health or illness, even when their presence in our diet may greatly reduce both the quality and length of our lives. Yet health experts dismiss the links between disease and wheat despite all the evidence.
1987 Mononucleosis (EBV)
2004 Hypomyopathic Dermatomyositis
2009 Lymphocytic Colitis
2010 GF/DF/SF Diet
2014 Low Dose Naltrexone
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35072
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

Zizzle,

The article itself may not be too bad, but how are we supposed to give it any credence when the author's star expert witness pulls a stupid stunt such as claiming that gliadin is a "new" discovery, and "It’s not gluten." The hell it isn't — it's a major component of gluten, and the alpha gliadin peptide is the primary peptide that celiacs react to. That's an absolutely idiotic claim for anyone to make, let alone a doctor. :roll:

If the author is going to write an article about a scientific or medical issue, she should take it upon herself to verify that such claims don't conflict with common (medical or scientific) knowledge. That's a basic part of the responsibility of writing such articles. I feel sorry for her. She just happened to pick a nitwit as a reference. :lol:

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
Post Reply

Return to “Main Message Board”