No, coffee doesn't cause Parkinson's disease — according to research, it may help to prevent it. In fact, researchers claim that 2 or more cups a day can reduce the chances of developing Parkinson's disease by 40 %. Apparently, caffeine prevents the loss of nerve cells. How about that? But of course, it's not enough to drink coffee, or some other natural source of caffeine, such as (gasp) chocolate. Noooooooooooooo. Nosiree, that would be too sensible. What we desperately need to do is to develop a drug to do the job, as is so ineloquently described in the following quote, taken from the article at the link below:
Say what? The research shows that 2 cups of coffee reduces the odds of developing Parkinson's disease by 40 %. As drugs go, that's a pretty impressive level of efficacy. My guess is that no one will be able to develop a (relatively safe) drug that will do significantly better, without introducing significant or even life-threatening side effects.“One reason we need to develop a drug rather than use caffeine, which can be taken so cheaply, is that we need an effect that is larger than that which can be obtained with caffeine, without the side effects,” said Bertil Fredholm, a Swedish researcher who has studied caffeine’s effects for more than 40 years, in a Skype interview.
So the real reason for developing a drug to deliver caffeine is (as always) MONEY/GREED. Everyone knows that utilizing coffee (or any other conventional type of food) as a source of caffeine is way too cheap (that's even mentioned in the quote above) — because most people are going to drink coffee anyway, regardless of any health benefits. So we gotta develop an expensive prescription drug in order to make people feel as though they're actually doing something to improve their health, doncha know (and the painful dent in their wallet will help to verify that feeling ). Researchers are smart enough to realize that a lot of people still naively think that drugs are the best way to improve their health. After all, they're doctor-recommended, so what could be better than that.
Is this general attitude of the medical research industry pathetic, or what? Apparently most medical researchers don't realize that if more caffeine is needed than can be found in 2 cups of coffee, some people can actually tolerate more than 2 cups of coffee (believe it or not).
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-03-1 ... entia.html
Every time I read a self-serving comment such as that, where some researcher proposes developing a drug to replace whole food, my respect for the medical research industry ratchets down by another notch. Currently, researchers with that attitude are sitting just above pond scum on my respect scale, but I'm not sure how long they will be able to hold that position.
Tex