Most important Lupus research in decades!

Feel free to discuss any topic of general interest, so long as nothing you post here is likely to be interpreted as insulting, and/or inflammatory, nor clearly designed to provoke any individual or group. Please be considerate of others feelings, and they will be considerate of yours.

Moderators: Rosie, Stanz, Jean, CAMary, moremuscle, JFR, Dee, xet, Peggy, Matthew, Gabes-Apg, grannyh, Gloria, Mars, starfire, Polly, Joefnh

Post Reply
User avatar
Zizzle
King Penguin
King Penguin
Posts: 3492
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:47 am

Most important Lupus research in decades!

Post by Zizzle »

I am posting the whole thing here, since it may require a MedScape login to view it. Basically puts Lupus back into the category of AI diseases influenced or caused by gut bacteria. Like some of us suspect of MC, this may be about our immune system attacking normal, friendly,"commensal" bacteria in our guts. How to deal with this? I don't know. But targeted antibiotics or even vaccines may be on the horizon. And surely diet has the ability to alter number and varieties of gut bacteria. Trouble is finding which one to stop feeding...

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/825045

Medscape Medical News
Lupus Studies Point to Gut Microbes, Epigenetics
Janis C. Kelly
May 13, 2014
The complex network of genetic, environmental, and hormonal factors believed to contribute to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is slowly being dissected, researchers report in a special issue of Lupus devoted to environmental causes of SLE. Several lines of research converged on the commensal bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract (the gut microbiota), which can be influenced by dietary and other external factors to alter immune response, and on environmental agents that inhibit epigenetic T-cell DNA methylation, which can trigger lupus flares in the genetically predisposed.

Christopher J. Edwards MD, MBBS, FRCP, and Karen H. Costenbader, MD, MPH, introduced the special issue with an editorial on epigenetics and the microbiome.

"Previously, we have been able just to list putative environmental factors that might be of importance and show the results of epidemiological studies. For the first time, we can now suggest how this actually works. It is still very complicated, but this work really shines a light on a complex area," Dr. Edwards told Medscape Medical News. Dr. Edwards is consultant rheumatologist and associate director of the National Institute for Health Research Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Clue to How the Environment Acts Via the Genes to Produce Lupus

"We have thought for a long time that lupus and other autoimmune and inflammatory diseases like it are caused by both genetic and environmental factors and their interactions. Epigenetic modifications, influenced by the environment and controlling the expression of the genes, may explain how the environment acts via the genes to produce lupus,” Dr. Costenbader told Medscape Medical News. “We still don't know very much about exactly which factors are involved or how those interactions and the coordination of gene expression across the genome work, though," he added. Dr. Costenbader is associate professor of medicine, Harvard Medical School, and codirector of the Lupus Center at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Epigenetics refers to changes in gene expression resulting from changes in the structure of DNA that influence how available a gene is for transcription. Two key epigenetic processes are the addition of methyl groups to the DNA itself and the modification of histone proteins that bind to and help condense and package DNA.

The microbiome is the total population of bacteria and other microorganisms that reside in the gut. These bacteria aid in digestion, influence the host immune system, and produce epigenetic changes.

Animal studies described by S. M. Vieira, PhD, from the Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, and colleagues showed that the onset and severity of experimental lupus differed in germ-free and conventionally raised mice and that microbial triggers might contribute to SLE pathogenesis by altering expression of TLR7/9 and upsetting the effector/regulatory T cell equilibrium. The authors also suggest that sex-specific differences in commensals might play a role in female-biased autoimmune diseases such as SLE and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

"Our findings are still very preliminary and only based on animal models, but suggest that the gut microbiota is not only involved in APS but unexpectedly also in the pathogenesis of lupus. We are currently trying to figure out which components of the microbiota influence lupus nephritis and APS by depleting some, but not all, gut commensals,” senior author Martin A. Kriegel, MD, PhD, told Medscape Medical News. “Many details still remain to be determined, but the general finding that there is a connection between the microbiome and lupus is quite clear and suggests that novel therapeutic avenues could be developed in the future that are targeting not the host but one's microbiota. Since lupus has classically been considered to be a disease independent from the microbiota, it does change our basic understanding of the pathogenesis," he explained.

Dr. Kriegel is assistant professor of immunobiology and of medicine, Yale University School of Medicine. He said his group plans to report preliminary data from the lupus/APS gut commensals study at the American College of Rheumatology 2014 Annual Meeting in November.

In the clinical setting, Dr. Kriegel recommended that patients pay a little more attention to what effects various diets may have on their disease. "The long-standing anecdotal patient reports of certain diets worsening or improving flares might be more real than we thought. They should be studied more systematically, now that we know that almost any dietary component acts on the gut microbiota, [which] in turn has profound effects on the immune system," Dr. Kriegel said. He also warned that patients should not assume that the various "probiotic" products now available to consumers would have a beneficial effect in lupus. "Probiotics could theoretically even worsen a disease state, since it is possible that physiologic immune responses against benign commensals could fuel autoimmune responses via cross-reactivity (as we hypothesize) or other mechanisms," he said.

Dr. Kriegel concluded, "I think the best will be to wait until we have a better understanding of which commensals or commensal-derived products might be driving which autoimmune disease and then target those with a diet that is known to modulate these strains or products. Ideally, the field will also develop eventually novel types of antibiotics or vaccinations against certain commensals. Such approaches would allow us, in the future, to more specifically modulate the gut microbiota in autoimmunity."

Epigenetic processes help explain the complex interactions between genes and the environment. Dr. Edwards predicted this will help researchers understand the processes involved in the development of inflammatory diseases such as lupus and rheumatoid arthritis. "Without these, we will just continue to do more and more detailed genome-wide association studies...and produce longer lists of possible environmental factors. Epigenetics may help to understand not just the 'what' but the 'how,' " Dr. Edwards said. "It is early days, but there is very real hope and promise here for new therapies aimed at the heart of the gene–environment interaction."

Dr. Costenbader added a note of caution: Because epigenetic modifications control the expression of genes across the entire genome, researchers will also need to know more about the downstream effects of manipulating gene expression in lupus.

The authors, Dr. Edwards, and Dr. Costenbader have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Lupus. 2014;23:505-506, 518-526. Article abstract, Editorial extract
1987 Mononucleosis (EBV)
2004 Hypomyopathic Dermatomyositis
2009 Lymphocytic Colitis
2010 GF/DF/SF Diet
2014 Low Dose Naltrexone
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35071
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

:headscratch:

Well call me slow, but after reading that report, I can't see where they've actually accomplished anything. It was already general knowledge that gut bacteria can and do have an affect on virtually everything that happens in the body. As far as their giving a nod to diet having an effect on lupus, IMO, someday in the distant future, researchers will eventually discover that diet is a factor in the etiology and treatment of all autoimmune type diseases (as I suggested in the book). The only thing unique about lupus (and every one of the other autoimmune type diseases) is the respective genetics that select for those diseases, in the presence of stress and diet issues that predispose to autoimmune type reactions in general. :shrug: There's nothing mysterious about it.

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
User avatar
Zizzle
King Penguin
King Penguin
Posts: 3492
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:47 am

Post by Zizzle »

Tex,
Lupus has long enjoyed a category unto itself, perhaps due to its seriousness, and perhaps to due to its association with environmental toxins (Lupus clusters near superfund sites, poor, contaminated neighborhoods, etc). It's rare to find a Lupus patient who believes they have any control over the condition. Lupus is thought to have a mind of its own, a randomness of attack. Doctors don't seem to tie diet or gluten issues to Lupus, perhaps because Lupus tends to strike more people of non-European descent (blacks, hispanics, asians), so generally fewer people with celiac genetics. I have several friends with Lupus who eat and drink whatever they want, with a fatalistic view of their disease, like "since it's going to kill me, and nothing I do seems to help, I might as well enjoy myself."

I think this seemingly "obvious" piece of research may be enough to send droves of Lupus patients (and their doctors) looking for anti-inflammatory diets and gut healing protocols. Then again, if this leads to a discovery that Lupus stems from an immune attack on our own e.coli bacteria, I suppose the fatalism will continue.
1987 Mononucleosis (EBV)
2004 Hypomyopathic Dermatomyositis
2009 Lymphocytic Colitis
2010 GF/DF/SF Diet
2014 Low Dose Naltrexone
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35071
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

Zizzle wrote:Doctors don't seem to tie diet or gluten issues to Lupus
Yep. Until they get tired of us nagging them for a decade or three, doctors don't tend to tie diet or gluten issues with anything other than celiac disease. That's how they're formally trained, and traditionally, it has been beneath their dignity to listen to what patients have to say. Fortunately that seems to be changing in many locations now, so there is a glimmer of hope for the future.

And it's not surprising that most lupus patients eat and drink what they choose, because that's surely what their doctors tell them to do, and most people aren't interested in learning enough about their disease issues to be able to deal with them properly themselves, or even enough to be able to make good decisions about their treatment program, because they believe that they can trust their doctors to look out for their health needs.

Yes, I agree with you that it's possible that the publication of this research may inspire additional research that might someday lead to a change of attitude and better treatment of the disease. I'm not holding my breath though, because the old published research article that's summarized in the abstract quoted below, reminds me that doctors always tend to cherry-pick the new discoveries that interest them enough for them to adopt any changes in their routine. This article was published back in 1988 (that's over 26 years ago — almost 3 decades ago.)

The article clearly demonstrates that a high fat diet, devoid of grains, sugar, and milk, will lower the cholesterol level of patients who have hypercholesterolemia. So how are doctors still treating hypercholesterolemia these days (26 years later)? By advising their patients to eat a low-fat diet, and take a statin, of course (for the rest of their life). Well duh! Pardon my skepticism, but I get the impression that as a group, doctors tend to be very selective learners. They seem to rely far too heavily on whatever the drug reps choose to teach them. :roll:
Abstract
Multiple food allergies required a group of seven patients with elevated serum cholesterol levels to follow a diet in which most of the calories came from beef fat. Their diets contained no sucrose, milk, or grains. They were given nutritional supplements. This is the only group of people in recent times to follow such a diet. During the study, the patients' triglyceride levels decreased from an average of 113 mg/dl to an average of 74 mg/dl; at the same time, their serum cholesterol levels fell from an average of 263 mg/dl to an average of 189 mg/dl. At the beginning of the study, six of the patients had an average high-density lipoprotein percentage of 21%. At the end of the study, the average had risen to 32%. These findings raise an interesting question: are elevated serum cholesterol levels caused in part not by eating animal fat (an extremely "old food"), but by some factor in grains, sucrose, or milk ("new foods") that interferes with cholesterol metabolism?
The red emphasis is mine, of course.

Reducing the serum cholesterol level with a diet high in animal fat.

Tex.
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
Post Reply

Return to “Main Message Board”