Blood tests (Mediator Release Testing)

Feel free to discuss any topic of general interest, so long as nothing you post here is likely to be interpreted as insulting, and/or inflammatory, nor clearly designed to provoke any individual or group. Please be considerate of others feelings, and they will be considerate of yours.

Moderators: Rosie, Stanz, Jean, CAMary, moremuscle, JFR, Dee, xet, Peggy, Matthew, Gabes-Apg, grannyh, Gloria, Mars, starfire, Polly, Joefnh

Post Reply
User avatar
mbozard
Little Blue Penguin
Little Blue Penguin
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 9:24 pm

Blood tests (Mediator Release Testing)

Post by mbozard »

So, I've resolved to get the stool testing but I just saw the link on the Home Page about Blood tests (Mediator Release Testing) and on the provided link about, MRT III®: The Future of Food Sensitivity Testing. Do I need to do both the stool testing and the blood test?
User avatar
Zizzle
King Penguin
King Penguin
Posts: 3492
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:47 am

Post by Zizzle »

You don't need to do both. Enterolab identifies the biggies for you, namely gluten ,dairy, soy, eggs, meats, etc. I did MRT and found it helpful in the short-run. We all have leaky intestines, so we are likely to react to the foods we eat most often. In my case, the MRT reported 26 problem foods and chemicals for me at a yellow level (moderate reactivity). They included apples, bananas, avocados, garlic, onions, cucumbers, white potatoes, sodium benzoate, Blue food coloring, pork, lamb, shrimp, etc, etc. but not milk, wheat, and soy (perhaps because I don't eat them?). They acknowledge that they are a point-in-time analysis, and you can avoid the foods for 60-90 days and try reintroducing them. I suppose by then you'll be sensitive to the foods you were eating while eliminating all the MRT foods!!

I have since reintroduced nearly all my MRT yellow foods, some I never eliminated, and nothing really changed either way.

However, if you get RED level results on MRT, those may be worth avoiding long-term.



Since you are in the business of testing, another test I found helpful (I've had them all!!) was the Cyrex Labs Celiac Cross-Reactivity test. But I have celiac genetics and presumed celiac (not sure if that matters). That test showed that I react to buckwheat, amaranth, sesame seeds and coffee in the same way I react to gluten. Interestingly, I had noticed reactions to all those foods before doing the test, so I avoid them all now.
1987 Mononucleosis (EBV)
2004 Hypomyopathic Dermatomyositis
2009 Lymphocytic Colitis
2010 GF/DF/SF Diet
2014 Low Dose Naltrexone
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35071
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

:iagree:

If you are unable to achieve remission by cutting out all of the foods that the EnteroLab results show to be a problem for you, then the MRT will offer some additional foods to consider avoiding. But the accuracy of the MRT results typically are not as reliable as the EnteroLab results, and MRT results often/usually miss the main offenders (such as gluten, casein, etc.). Here's the way I view it:

EnteroLab results always trump MRT results. But MRT results can supplement EnteroLab results, to help track down additional food sensitivities that the EnteroLab tests do not cover.

Most members here order the EnteroLab tests first, and if they are not able to achieve remission by applying that information, then they consider ordering the MRT.

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
Polly
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5185
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 3:34 am
Location: Maryland

Post by Polly »

Well said, Tex. I needed both to achieve full remission, but the MRT was used secondarily, to "fine tune" my diet.

Love,

Polly
Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to be amused.
Post Reply

Return to “Main Message Board”