From time to time, I reread some of the "cornerstone" information available about MC, and occasionally gain new insights, or at least a bit of thought-provoking inspiration. In looking at this "famous" speech made by Dr. Fine, in 2003, I'm struck by some of the observations that have never been disputed, verified, or whatever, by others in the field, and yet they are quite remarkable.
https://www.enterolab.com/StaticPages/E ... gnosis.htm
For example, consider this:
Dr. Fine points out that, according to his research, approximately 29% of the general population, (with no outward symptoms), show antibodies to gluten when their stool samples are tested; and, in fact, about one-third of those, (11% of the general population), showed antigliadin antibodies in their blood. Obviously, the old saw about one in 133, (or whatever), people in this country having celiac disease, must be taken with a grain of salt, since gluten intolerance is obviously quite common.
Evidence of this comes from a study that I performed. We tested 227 normal volunteers with blood tests for celiac disease. Twenty-five of these people (11%) had either antigliadin IgG or IgA in their blood versus only one (0.4%) that had antiendomysial, antitissue transglutaminase, and antigliadin IgA in the blood. So for every one person in a population that has the antibodies that have 100% specificity for celiac disease of the intestine (antiendomysial and antitissue transglutaminase), there are 24 that have antibodies to gliadin that may not have celiac disease.
Also, note that in that talk, he stated:In normal people without specific symptoms or syndromes, the stool test is just under 3 times more likely to be positive than blood (29% vs. 11%, respectively). That’s a lot more people reacting to gluten than 1 in 150 who have celiac disease. 29% of the normal population of this country, almost all of whom eat gluten, showing an intestinal immunologic reaction to the most immune-stimulating of dietary proteins really is not so high or far fetched a percentage, especially in light of the facts that 11% of them display this reaction in blood, and 42% carry the HLA-DQ2 or DQ8 celiac genes.
This is exactly the opposite of what most medical "experts" maintain, with their old line about MC being a "rare" disease. So is it common or rare?Microscopic colitis is a very common chronic diarrheal syndrome, accounting for 10% of all causes of chronic diarrhea in all patients, and is the most common cause of ongoing chronic diarrhea in a treated celiac, affecting 4% of all celiac patients.
What are your thoughts on these "observations? Am I the only one in the world who wonders about them? I'm not doubting their accuracy - I'm wondering why no one else has ever disputed these claims, or acknowledged them, expanded on them, or whatever. Is it because no one in the medical world wants to rock the boat?
Tex