Do we trust them

This forum contains current news items that may be of interest to us.

Moderators: Rosie, Jean, CAMary, moremuscle, JFR, Dee, xet, Peggy, Matthew, Gabes-Apg, grannyh, Gloria, Mars, starfire, Polly, Joefnh

Post Reply
User avatar
Gabes-Apg
Emperor Penguin
Emperor Penguin
Posts: 8332
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 3:12 pm
Location: Hunter Valley NSW Australia

Do we trust them

Post by Gabes-Apg »

do we trust the accuracy of the report??

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/he ... 6047991379

ONE of Australia's biggest drug companies will reveal next month how much money it pays to doctors, health groups and research institutes in grants and fees -- a first step that could eventually allow patients to tally payments to their own doctors.
The move is intended to improve transparency in the medicines industry, which turned over more than $21.5 billion in 2008-09 amid increasing claims of hidden conflicts of interest.
Gabes Ryan

"Anything that contradicts experience and logic should be abandoned"
Dalai Lama
User avatar
tex
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 35066
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:00 am
Location: Central Texas

Post by tex »

I think that you can trust it - what there is of it. It will probably take a few years before all the details show up, though.

The law that was passed in the U. S., for example, (The Physician Payments Sunshine Act), was apparently a part of the Health Care Reform Bill, but similar to many of the other parts of the bill, companies who make payments to physicians won't have to start keeping records of those payments, until 2012, and they won't have to report the information until March 31, 2013. Supposedly, it will be posted in a searchable database, starting on Sept. 30, 2013. According to the law, anything worth more than $10, must be reported, whether it be in the form of stock options, research grants, trinkets, consulting fees, travel fees, meals, hotel expenses, or whatever.

The senators who originally introduced the bill upon which the final bill was based, felt that physicians who receive benefits from drug companies and device manufacturers are more inclined to prescribe the priciest products. Prior to the enactment of the Federal law, several states had similar laws, (Vermont, Massachusetts and Minnesota), and since they originally passed the legislation, they have gone on to amend their laws to ban most gifts outright, (Vermont even bans gifts of meals), although Massachusetts and Minnesota still allow physicians to accept speaking fees, and most product samples. All three states allow corporations to award research grants to physicians, however.

Frankly, I wasn't even aware that it had been included in the Healthcare Reform Bill, until I looked it up, after reading the article at the link that you posted. As huge as the Reform Bill was, it will surely take many more years before we learn all the details about it.

Vermont's law has been in effect for quite a few years, (the reporting requirement there began in 2002), and their Attorney General recently released data that showed that total payments to physicians dropped 13 percent in fiscal 2009, (to $2.6 million), so maybe this will eventually trickle down as lower costs for consumers of medical care. I reckon we'll see what develops. :shrug:

Thanks for posting that info.

Tex
:cowboy:

It is suspected that some of the hardest material known to science can be found in the skulls of GI specialists who insist that diet has nothing to do with the treatment of microscopic colitis.
Post Reply

Return to “News Releases of Interest”